I was born in early 1996 which makes me a 2000s kid. I believe that you have to be born in the 80s or *very* early in the 90s to be considered a 90s kid. Most people born at the same time as me desperately want to be 90s kids, but what's wrong with being a 2000s kid? It annoys me when people say "I feel sorry for 2000s kids!" The early 2000s were practically the same as the 90s, like the same tv shows, same music style, similar fashion, etc. I don't know why Justin Bieber, iphones, etc. And all that nonsense are associated with 2000s kids, because I wasn't really a kid when any of that happened, I was a teenager. I would say kids who were *born* in the 2000s should be associated with the aforementioned, because they are the kids of today.
Added (1). I actually did own a Gameboy color that came out in the 90s, the very first came out in the 80s. Also, I wasn't a kid when One Direction first came out, I was a teenager…
Added (2). You guys are missing the point. Most of my childhood was spent in the first half of the 2000s when we did not have music like One Direction, Justin Bieber, etc. And we didn't have things like iphones either, or at least I don't know any kid who ever had one. Those things are around today but I'm not a child, therefore those things aren't part of my childhood.